Hi, On 02.10.2017 18:50, Christoph Hormann wrote: > Of course i am certainly not representative for the typical mappers. I > would suspect there are probably mappers that would be attracted and > motivated by an OSM project where bots routinely 'fix' data > inconsistencies like typos in tags, different spellings of common names > or automatically orthogonalize building geometries. But there are > others who don't like this. One motivation behind my suggestion was > that this would allow mappers to embrace bot edits but also allows them > to reject this and decide they only want to interact with other craft > mappers and not with bots.
Did your proposal also extend to geoemtries? You said something about bot:* tags, but if a bot were to orthogonalize an existing building, would it then have to create a copy of that tagged "bot:building=yes"? And how could that be differentiated from a building that originally had building=YES and the bot only lowercased the tag value? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
