On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 20:10 +0100, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM wrote: > But, are you sure they are bad edits? did you use the 2016 imagery > specified in the mapping projet? > > For example, change set 53330616, the first one i randomly looked at > from you list looks like bad editing until you use the 2016 imagery, > please see the attached two images, one with Bing/DG Premium (they > look the same) and one with the imagery supplied with the project.
This point has been repeated so I'll say one last time that this has nothing to do with imagery alignment. It has to do with destroying previous buildings and re-adding them, or adding new buildings on top of them without destroying them, or other various weird edits. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
