Hi Blake,

yes,  I messed up something. :(

saturday morning i asked my mail provider to fix that problem, but they didn't do anything. it's weekend :(

time to change the provider.

Regards

walter


Am 11.03.2018 um 01:33 schrieb Blake Girardot:
Hi Walter,

No, the subject of this thread about spam related to OSM changesets,
it has nothing to do with email.

Your rejection notice is because it seems OSM's email servers make use
of a service that "block lists" other email servers that have an
alleged reputation of sending spam. However you send your emails, they
are being sent through a server that is on that block list and
therefor OSM's email servers refuse to accept it or any emails that
come from your email provider's servers.

Following the link in the message you included provides more
information: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647

Regards,
blake

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Walter Nordmann <wnordm...@gmx.de> wrote:
is that the reason for that?

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of
its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es)
failed:

tagg...@openstreetmap.org:
SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host:
a.mx.openstreetmap.org (212.110.172.32) reason: 550-Rejected because
82.165.159.14 is in a black list at zen.spamhaus.org
550 https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647

could not send mails to tagging for 2 days.
walter

Am 05.03.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Jason Remillard:

Hi,

This weekend I put together a SPAM detector for OSM changesets.

https://github.com/jremillard/osm-changeset-classification

You don't need to be a developer to contribute, send over any SPAM'y
changesets you come across via a github issue, a pull request, or even an
email to me. I just need the changeset id.

The code is currently hitting 99+% accuracy detecting the difference between
1500 random normal edits and 1500 sketchy changesets that Fredrick shared
with the talk-us last last week. This is with zero tuning, so it looks like
it will work well.

Jason


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk





_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to