25. May 2018 20:17 by frede...@remote.org <mailto:frede...@remote.org>:
> I think the key here is, like so often, verifiability. Things in OSM > must be verifiable, and I'd like to add "... with reasonable effort by > an average person". If something is verifiable only with expensive > special gear by a person with a doctorate in physics, then maybe OSM is > not the place. Same with recurring things - if their frequency is so low > that the effort to verify them becomes unreasonable, then don't map. > I completely agree with that. > My gut feeling is that something that happens once a week is reasonably > easy to verify. Something that happens once a month, mmh, maybe ok. > Something that happens once a year is, in my opinion, too hard to verify > and should be left out. > I would expect limit somewhere between "once a month" and "once a year".
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
