Hi Maurizio If the context is actually using data from whosonfirst, I don't believe that this is actually a sensible question. Any data source used by wof that actually has a licence that is suitable for use in OSM could be used directly without the added complication of the linux foundations licence. Historically wof has suffered from similar issues as "Open"Addresses, I believe however that they put a significant effort into cleaning things up a bit before the demise of Mapzen, but I wouldn't be surprised if they still had CC BY sources, which as we all know are not suitable for use in OSM .
Outside of that, no, the LWG has not made a determination if at all or with what caveats CDLA licensed data could be included in OSM. Simon PS: long diatribe on why on earth the linux foundation is supporting an OSM competitor not included. Am 22.08.2018 um 15:27 schrieb Maurizio Napolitano: > Today I became aware of this open data license created by the Linux Foundation > https://cdla.io/permissive-1-0/ > > In my point of view this license appears very pragmatic. > I read the license text, the FAQs and this nice blog post of the > project Who's On First > https://whosonfirst.org/blog/2018/08/21/license-change/ > > I need to understand if, a dataset under this license, can be imported > in OpenStreetMap without asking more permissions to the data provider. > The section 3 is dedicated to the "Conditions on Rights Granted" > There is a restriction dedicated to the rules for the attribution, but > it appears very light. > > What do you think? > > In any case, the CLDA Permisive sounds me more efficienty as the cc-by. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
