Ah, but wouldn't the alternative be for OSM to be under the LF umbrella/decrees, and we couldn't have that, you and I would be out of a job, Simon ;)
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 6:08 PM Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > WOF as a OSM compeitor. > > Am 22.08.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Kathleen Lu: > > > > PS: long diatribe on why on earth the linux foundation is supporting an >> > OSM competitor not included. >> >> mmm... this is not good. >> Do you know the reasons? >> > > Simon - did you mean an OSM competitor or an ODbL competitor? > > (Best I know from various rumors is that various big companies wanted a > LF-blessed open data license and they had things they did not like about > ODbL.) > > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
