Plenty of house in Ireland don't have a housenumber. So just don't add
addr:housenumber! If there's a name, then use addr:housename.
IMO you should enter the correct "addr:*" tags, and it's up to the
geocoder to show them right. You could always use addr:full to help it?
I think "name:absent=yes" is better for "this thing doesn't have a
name", which is extensible to "addr:housenumber:absent=yes". But is
anywhere using *any* "no name" scheme?
On 22.08.2018 17:17, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
What is the best way to represent places which have no housenumber?
It's the same problem described in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Addresses#Missing_housenumbers
(and this same doubt arose recently in the Brazilian community)
By leaving the housenumber empty we don't know in fact if the place
doesn't have a housenumber or if it wasn't just filled.
Similarly to using name="No name" to represent a street with no name,
using any kind of value in addr:housenumber would be wrong and cause
the same kind of problems.
How could we solve this, please?
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
