I would disagree with Christoph's assumption that addresses must be unique.
The purpose of an address is to help someone locate something. It gets
"close enough", with the definition of that phrase varying by
locality/society/observer. ALL addresses, in that sense, are "partial", to
use Christoph's term.

Multiple objects may share an address. In fact, this has just been raised
in the context of cycleways (should they share the name of the street they
parallel?). Other examples have already been given in this thread (the red
shed). And the converse is also true: single objects may have multiple
addresses. Addresses can be many-to-one or one-to-many; a one-to-one
relationship is not required.

Back to the OP, I think the "no" prefix tags are problematic in general
(noaddress, noname). I personally like Martin's proposal of a "no_" prefix.
At least that's easier for data consumers to suss out. So I'd vote for
no_addr:housenumber=yes.

There is, in fact, an address in these cases, so "noaddress=yes" is wrong.

John


On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 4:49 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 24/08/18 18:40, Rory McCann wrote:
> > On 22/08/18 23:40, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 22 August 2018, Rory McCann wrote:
> >>>> The single most important property of an address is that it is
> >>>> unique
> >>>
> >>> 35% of addresses in Ireland aren't unique.
> >>
> >> I strongly suspect we have a different understanding of either 'address'
> >> or 'uniqueness' here.
> >
> > Possibly. The Irish definition is "a property has the same address with
> > a least one other property". I'm not talking about 2 postboxes that are
> > beside each other in an apartment block, but 2 houses which could be a
> > distance apart. Post/Packages is delivered partially based on surname,
> > or "local knowledge" 😉. It is/was a pain. The new postcode ("eircode")
> > will help. Now, you may say the surname is part of the address, but what
> > happens when someone moves house?
>
> The 'names' I refer to are the 'names' of the property, not the name of
> the resident/s.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to