As we've mentioned multiple times over the last months, the LWG decided last year to consolidate all attribution guidance in to one document and address some of the use cases that have become common over the last 7 years that previously had none. Particularly in the light of the parallel discussions about attribution on larger social media platforms we need to make up our minds what we actually want, and define concrete minimum requirements for acceptable attribution. To not do this just provides the excuse of pointing to the cacophony of voices all saying something different.
We've been working on and off on the document for a while, and are now largely finished. Going forward we intend to wikify the document and make it available for public comment together with a BoF session at SotM next month (which probably means that we'll have to appropriate a coffee break). You can have a glimpse at the text here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e_IQYHtqVivGRw4O4EOn6__-LGMuzPlWz6XKEdAkwW0/edit?usp=sharing the few things that are not nailed down belong to those that we would appreciate feedback on. Simon PS: the number of coffee breaks permitting we might want to appropriate another one for the discussion of a tile licence change.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
