about their choice of using HERE, I'm not aware of the reason. OSM road network in Portugal is quite good.
A terça, 8/10/2019, 20:39, Nuno Caldeira <[email protected]> escreveu: > you understood me wrong. I meant it was a good example of compliance. it's > a fair and correct solution. don't understand why others (including OSMF > corporate members) don't do the same. > > A terça, 8/10/2019, 20:37, Clifford Snow <[email protected]> > escreveu: > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:33 AM Nuno Caldeira < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Speaking of attribution, here's a great example by Microsoft Bing maps, >>> that has attribution based on the zoom level, they seem to be using OSM >>> buildings and HERE roads >>> https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=39.97203083116834~-8.634339&lvl=10&style=r&FORM=BMLOGO >>> >>> >>> Up until they got contacted by OSMF to fix the attribution, nothing will >>> happen and won't comply. They do not reply or give lazy excuses when a >>> contributor approaches them >>> >> Nuno I'm confused by your statement on Bing maps. The clearly attribute >> OSM when zoomed in. If they only use HERE data when zoomed out, what >> requirements do they have to attribute OSM and if so on what basis? When >> zoomed in, both HERE and OSM are attributed. >> >> OT - One of the problems I noticed using two different data sources in >> Portugal is roads intersecting buildings. I've never been to Portugal - how >> good is OSM compared to HERE? Why can't they drop HERE and just use OSM? >> >> Best, >> Clifford >> >> -- >> @osm_washington >> www.snowandsnow.us >> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch >> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
