Às 09:35 de 01/11/2019, Jeffrey Friedl escreveu:
For ABC I would not have chosen the term “require” from XYZ but they probably
must make them aware
that in the product they are selling there are third party rights
(OpenStreetMap’s copyright) which come
with certain obligations (ODbL).
In my example, OSM copyright doesn't apply to XYZ because it's simply not
making a copy of OSM data.
The ABC company is taking OSM data and making a copy (map tiles). It's ABC
that is serving the map tiles.
It's ABC (and only ABC) that's actually accessing OSM data, so it's ABC (and
only ABC) that has any
copyright exposure.
It's as if I took your famous photograph and made a million prints and then
advertised them for sale at stores throughout the world. The stores are not
making copies of your photograph... they're just passing
along information about a product. It's me who would be on the hook for the
copyright violation, because
it's me who made the copies without right.
(As a photographer, I've paid attention to US law on copyright, but that lens
may not really be appropriate
for this thread about attribution, so if I've gotten too far off topic, by all
means just ignore it. :-D )
Jeffrey
I think you need to read this to avoid making those statements
https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/index.html
You are comparing different things and that doesn't make sense at all
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
