I wouldn't be so quick to dis our wiki, Guillaume. Personally, I find it a relatively-easy-entry system for plastic, live documentation of a project and its data, process and people. It serves this purpose well even for less-than-tech-friendly folk and has for the life of our project. Wikis can be encyclopedic in their scope, yes. However, building long-term (many years) projects out of them is a proven-many-times case. Wikis accommodate fast-moving and slow and steady growth alike. Color-coded tables often provide at-a-glance status. It isn't hard to copy-and-paste and build things out of things, with other people building things, too, meet-ya-in-the-wiki.
SteveA California _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
