Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 01:30 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg < [email protected]>:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 2:49 AM Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> or to use tricks like the “place=neighbourhood” one (which is based on >> POIs rather than polygons)? >> >> It is certainly wrong to do this. >> > > I think the “trick” here is referring to the stand at practice of mapping > all place= features as nodes, including neighborhoods, because their > boundaries are usually fuzzy (and precise boundaries can be mapped with > boundary=administrative or another boundary= tag). > mostly I agree, although it should be mentioned that neighbourhood (or other place boundaries like quarter and suburb) may be very clear although they aren't officially declared: when they are hard "natural" borders like railroads, rivers, motorways, etc. Also a change in the urban structure (urban confuguration, architectural style, living standards, socially / ownerstructure, etc.). can mark a border very strongly in some instances, without it having to be an administrative boundary. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
