> a change in the urban structure (urban confuguration, architectural style, > living standards, socially / ownerstructure, etc.). can mark a border very > strongly in some instances
Right, that's why we can map landuse=residential, landuse=industrial, landuse=commercial and landuse=retail as areas with clear boundaries. - Joseph Eisenberg On 1/12/20, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 01:30 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg < > [email protected]>: > >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 2:49 AM Mateusz Konieczny >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> or to use tricks like the “place=neighbourhood” one (which is based on >>> POIs rather than polygons)? >>> >>> It is certainly wrong to do this. >>> >> >> I think the “trick” here is referring to the stand at practice of mapping >> all place= features as nodes, including neighborhoods, because their >> boundaries are usually fuzzy (and precise boundaries can be mapped with >> boundary=administrative or another boundary= tag). >> > > > > mostly I agree, although it should be mentioned that neighbourhood (or > other place boundaries like quarter and suburb) may be very clear although > they aren't officially declared: when they are hard "natural" borders like > railroads, rivers, motorways, etc. Also a change in the urban structure > (urban confuguration, architectural style, living standards, socially / > ownerstructure, etc.). can mark a border very strongly in some instances, > without it having to be an administrative boundary. > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
