Yes, I understand the concern and am in the middle of adding clarification to the introduction to all 23 copies of the survey.
C On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 9:25 PM Mike Thompson <miketh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:58 PM Courtney <courtney.william...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Here, too, we gave quite a bit of careful thought to the decision. We >> felt that if we did not disclose that we were on the CWG, that it might be >> seen by some as a lapse of transparency. >> > It is good that you disclosed your affiliations. However, you also need > to make it abundantly clear that this project is not part of your work for > the CWG (and for those of you employed by TomTom, not part of your > employment). Otherwise, you are potentially misleading people to believe, > as I did, that this was an official CWG survey. I am assuming that you had > the best of intentions and that you were not trying to mislead anyone. > > As Frederick pointed out, members of some other working groups seem to do > a very good job of making it clear as to whether they are speaking as part > of a WG or as an individual. > > Mike > >> >>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
