Hallo!

Vor einigen Tagen habe ich auf einem Web-Board meine Zukunftsvision
beschrieben: Eine Welt voller Microsoft-zertifizierter Rechner, Blackboxen,
wartungsfrei, auf denen Microsoft die User bevormundet und bestimmt, was man 
zu tun und zu lassen hat. 

Die Realit�t hat mich leider eingeholt. Man f�hre sich mal den folgenden
Artikel zu Gem�te, insbesondere den sehr treffenden Nebensatz, in dem das
Wort "Linux" vorkommt.

Ich bin geschockt dar�ber, was heute m�glich zu sein scheint. Was mu� noch
passieren, damit die Menschen endlich aufwachen und merken, was los ist?
Auch wenn das im Artikel beschriebene Vorgehen von HP und Microsoft
aufgrund von Protesten wieder eingestellt wird, zeigt es sehr genau, wohin
die Reise geht. Und sei die initiale Legitimation nur, da� man damit 
Supportkosten sparen m�chte. Was das "weitergedacht" bedeutet, liegt nicht
besonders fern. Vielleicht ist die XBox ja ein kleiner Vorgeschmack darauf.

Alle schimpfen und meckern, �ber die aufgeblasene Software, �ber das so
b�se Monopol, aber niemand macht etwas, denn man braucht ja
Windows-Kenntnisse, um "auf dem Arbeitsmarkt bestehen" zu k�nnen. Microsoft
ist zwar keine Wohlfahrtsorganisation, aber Microsoft ist nicht die NSdAP. 
Wenn man Verrat begeht und Linux installiert, wird man nicht von der Gestapo 
zum Verh�r am Arbeitsplatz besucht. Man kann Microsoft den R�cken kehren, 
wenn man es nur will. Noch.

http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/02/18/020218opfoster.xml

February 15, 2002 01:01 PM PST

Revamping recovery
Ed Foster

THERE'S A CERTAIN magical quality to the operating system that comes with
some PCs. It's there, but it's not there.

For several years now we've been airing reader gripes about the
shortcomings of the Windows recovery CDs that come with their system, and
one vendor that previously came up in that context was Hewlett-Packard.
With the introduction of Windows XP, however, the complaints about HP's
recovery CD reached a whole new level. The problem with the recovery CD on
HP Pavilion systems is that there isn't one. Or, should I say, there is one
but it's not there.

"I just bought a Windows XP computer from HP," wrote one reader shortly
after XP's release last fall. "But there is no Windows XP CD in case
something goes wrong, not even a recovery CD. I called HP asking for a CD,
and was told that the hard disk has a recovery function built in, so I do
not need it. You figure whatever it means, that hard disk has recovery
ability! I asked them 'What do I need to do to get a CD?' and was told that
the only way I can get CD is to buy a Windows XP copy from my local
computer store!"

Readers who called HP to complain were told that XP was so big that half a
dozen or more CDs would be required to deliver all the recovery files. HP
had therefore decided instead to put it all on the hard drive in a
protected partition, at least theoretically allowing the recovery program
to be accessed even when there was damage to other parts of the hard drive.
Most readers were less than satisfied with HP's assurances and unhappy
about having to give up four-plus gigabytes of hard drive space for the
recovery program.

Even less happy were those who discovered that the recovery files weren't
always accessible when there was a problem. "After having my HP Pavilion
9905 since October 2001, I ran into some problems where I couldn't boot
into XP and couldn't run HP's recovery program," another reader wrote. "So,
I'm sitting here with a PC that at the moment is nonfunctional. HP's
support's solution is to ship the whole tower back so that they can reimage
my hard drive . ... What? Had I realized what kind of relationship I had
unknowingly entered with HP [I wouldn't have purchased from them]. No one
at HP volunteered the information that there are no recovery CDs shipped
with your PC order. This to me means that unless I install another OS, HP
controls my use of the PC that I paid them for."

As the complaints mounted, readers reported a change in tone from HP. In
January, the company announced that a set of Windows XP recovery CDs was
available by calling HP customer service. To defray some of the costs of
producing and shipping the CDs, however, HP decided to charge $9.95. Of
course this didn't sit well with those who expected the recovery CD to come
with their computer. But what really triggered a whole new wave of gripes
was the fact that HP wouldn't send the recovery CDs to just any Pavilion
customer ready to pay the $9.95. First, you had to answer some questions.

"I called, and they said they couldn't send it to me," said a reader who
wanted to have the recovery CDs as a backup option. "If you don't have an
immediate need for it, they won't let you order it. So I've got to wait
until my hard drive crashes and then sit around with no computer while I
wait for the CD to arrive."

HP's Web site states that customers can get the recovery CD set for three
reasons: if their hard drive has failed, if it has been upgraded, or if it
has been reformatted or repartitioned. Customers who just want to have the
recovery CDs on hand in case something happens are out of luck. And why did
HP feel obliged to ask why customers needed the CDs? Callers were told it
was due to HP's "contractual obligations" to Microsoft. More than one
reader noted ruefully that this puts users in a position of having to ask
HP, and presumably Microsoft, for permission to create a Linux partition on
their hard drive.

HP officials say they are just trying to provide the best recovery solution
they can. "For many years, one of the primary reasons for support calls
have been people who have lost their recovery CDs," says Bruce Greenwood,
North American marketing manager for HP's Pavilion line. "Our primary
motivation was to avoid that. We went to the strategy of loading it on the
hard drive because it's faster and it's selective. If you just want one
particular driver, you don't need to reburn the whole disk like you do with
many recovery CDs. And when we look at the metrics, our support calls have
gone down. So we've been surprised at what an emotional issue this has
become."

Greenwood stresses that HP is still open to finding ways to further
optimize its recovery solution. "We recognize that people have some valid
concerns, and we're looking at things we can do to mitigate these issues."
Providing customers with both the CDs and the disk-based recovery program
is not an option though, as that would violate HP's agreements with
Microsoft and other software partners. "They aren't asking us to be
draconian in this -- they're just asking to have customers give us a reason
."

Given all the problems readers have had with recovery CDs in the past, it
is certainly possible that HP's disk-based program will prove on balance to
be the better solution. Of course, a better solution still would be turn
back the clock to the days when the bundled OS actually consisted of the
same disks you'd get if you bought it in the store. Those days seem to have
vanished; a disappearing act that it's safe to say is not HP's doing.


What do you think about HP's new program on recovery CDs? Write Ed Foster,
InfoWorld's reader advocate. Contact him at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUG - Penguin User Group Wiesbaden - http://www.pug.org

Antwort per Email an