Alexis Cousein wrote: > But if you want to draw "conclusions" from this, you must clearly > learn how to form the negative of some boolean operators correctly > to avoid logical fallacies >
"Dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter", also known in some variants as "proof by example" (just in case someone is still in doubt, that's not a valid form of proof). "Some swans I've seen are white, so all swans are white". "Some Piazzolla numbers I've heard are undanceable, so..." (left as an exercise to the reader). -- Alexis Cousein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Systems Engineer/Solutions Architect SGI/Silicon Graphics -- <If I have seen further, it is by standing on reference manuals> _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
