+1 (non-binding)
On 5/28/05, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Harish Krishnaswamy: -1 (binding) > > I favor defaults like I have said before. And when there is confusion > as to what needs to be the default, my vote would be to make it > configurable. > > -Harish > > On 5/27/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I actually favor default-binding, I think it "looks nice", but it > > seems to be causing a lot of confusion, and may violate the > > "Consistency" principle. When in doubt ... vote; we'll see what the > > majority states. > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship: -0 (binding) > > -- > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
