On May 30, 2005, at 11:12 AM, J�r�me BERNARD wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
This is definitely going to be a nightmare to go through applications
already using this feature without forgetting some.
The applications that take advantage of the feature being voted upon
to remove is only in Tapestry 4.0 which is in alpha state right now.
We shouldn't concern ourselves with how transient changes like this
will affect applications using 4.0 alpha.
Erik
J�r�me.
On 5/28/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually favor default-binding, I think it "looks nice", but it
seems to be causing a lot of confusion, and may violate the
"Consistency" principle. When in doubt ... vote; we'll see what the
majority states.
Howard M. Lewis Ship: -0 (binding)
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
