I have say that requiring Java 5 is premature. I would only be
comfortable with it when all the major app servers are on it. Are they
yet? A lot of organizations are not going to go for 5 for a while yet.
-1 Jamie (non binding)
Brian K. Wallace wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hensley, Richard wrote:
| JDK 5 has already been advanced as the build tool for Hivemind. I don't
| think the same requirement for Tapestry 4.0 is a bad thing.
|
| Richard
|
'been advanced' is not the same in this situation as 'been decided'.
That aside, I do not believe that the view of "Tapestry Developer ==
Hivemind Developer" is, or should be, necessarily accurate. As long as
the binary is used by Tapestry, then source compilation of Tapestry
should stand on its own.
I'm a +1 personally to going to 1.5, but -0 for Tapestry as a project
going to 1.5 at the current time. Perhaps I'm being overly cautious, but
I've read too much about developers not being able to move on to 1.5 yet
(customers/corporate decisions/platforms/etc). Whether this holds any
sway in their need to compile Tapestry, however, is a separate matter
altogether.
Brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCp46taCoPKRow/gARAp9DAKCqXDs75oEK+u0j++nvvz0p2W0TGACgwTjL
vfEfRhdUxPzd2N2jqkIRD14=
=BXsk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
