Seems like a good idea to me. Do we have an agreed on definition of what 'beta' means? We decided this was version 4 because it was a big change, and keeping backwards compatability was not always going to be possible. I see no need to cling to this confusing/frustrating part of Tapestry in the name of 'beta'. 'beta' to me is not an API freeze gaurantee. 'rc' would be to me, but not 'beta'.
You are absolutely right.

I don't see this a major change at all: instead of initialize() use the appropriate listeners.
4.0 has so many major changes that I see this only as minor :)
And the most important: if it helps testing then it must be in 4.0!

Br,
Norbi


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to