[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-603?page=comments#action_12320253 ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship commented on TAPESTRY-603: ----------------------------------------------- Don't follow what one has to do with the other. The id property of th @Component annotation has nothing to do with a parameter of the component named "id". IComponent has an id property that DOES get in the way; this is one of the reasons for the future move to eliminate inheritance in Tapestry. What you can do is: @Parameter(name = "id") public abstract String getIdParameter(); You' bind the parameter as <binding name="id" value="..."/> but read/update the property inside the component as getIdParameter()/setIdParameter(). > annotation "component" parameter "id" making it impossible to define an id > parameter > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TAPESTRY-603 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-603 > Project: Tapestry > Type: Wish > Versions: 4.0 > Reporter: Ron Piterman > > defining @Component(id = "...") making it impossible to define id attribute > to components. > Id is a very important attribute in html, this is a serious limitation. > Why not use jwcid instead (which is also very intuitive...) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
