Participation has different forms not only patches. I use several open source products. I provided patches as I see it. Providing patches is the high level participation and not every user can be at that level. Do you mean "Shut up if no patches provided."? Is this the Tapestry policy?
I was not complaining at the first place. I was just trying to provide advice to make Tapestry more acceptable for general users. Tapestry is my choice for my upcoming project. I'm more eager to see it final than anyone. A good OSS project needs team work. Providing advice is normally the first step to participate. I have a strong will to have a high quality Tapestry. I like Tapestry to have a quality system. Users are your friends not your enemy. Are you saying "Go away!" to me? Best Regards, On 12/12/05, Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/12/05, Cliff Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know whether Tapestry has any quality procedures. While, I > followed > > up the mail-list quite awhile. My feeling is that Tapestry has no > quality > > procedures. > > > > I like to hear opinions from the Tapestry inner circle. > > Well, I understand and can agree with this but have you looked and commit > logs? > I see the vast majority of commit came from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I can see > tapestry development is almost totally driven by the need of its main > committer and that's fair, isn't it? > > Saying this is not to tell that tapestry community is irrelevant, just > to clarify that the development is lead by one person (who wrote, > architect, plan, document etc...) not by a team, maybe as more > committers comes in we can see all what you're talking about happens. > > Now the rude answer. > Please before start to complain give some goods patches. > > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
