Agreed. All the board are looking for (I believe) is someone who is: a) a committer b) chosen by consensus of the community c) someone they can work with - by which I really mean, not someone they can't work with.
Don't let shortness of time here get in the way. If the rest of the Tapestry community are behind you, I see no problem with that. Hen On 1/30/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't sell yourself short. You have already passed the post by being > voted in as a committer. If you have the will and the free time to > invest I'm a +1 to the idea. > > Myself, I have zero free time as it is and haven't yet figured out how > to function on negative free time. > > Geoff > > On 1/30/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heh, I appreciate the vote of confidence but I don't think three months of > > scattered development makes for a very good pmc. This would probably have to > > be one of the core existing dev's. (Or at leat someone who's been around for > > a year min..) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
