Hehehehe...I think I remember reading something somewhere about smarter people being a little more picky about which information they allow their brains to fill up with..Otherwise you only know a little bit about a lot of things.
If it's any consolation I started off with xml file definitions as well. On 2/12/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe I missed something; it just seemed easier to specify an XML file > as a suite, but I can look into labeling tests as groups and seeing if > that works. I'd prefer less XML (my new crusade). > > The point of side projects like ePluribus is for me to figure these > things out. Normally, I'm epxected to know everything about every Java > technology in existence. > > About three years, I did a talk about HiveMind at a JUG and from the > back of the audience this one guy stands up and proclaims: "Please > explain why you chose not to base the descriptors on YAML". As if > everyone knew what YAML was. > > On 2/11/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just being curious, what caused the need for creating an xml file? Only > > because of my recent interactions. > > > > I can say at the very least that in maven2, unless you have some weird > > runtime DataProvider stuff to setup there is actually 0 configuration > that > > needs to be done. Unless you wanted only a certain set of classes to be > run? > > But then, why not use groups to specify the classes instead of inviduals > > themselves? No idea what you environment is like, but would love to know > of > > any issues beforehand. > > > > On 2/11/06, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:28:01 -0500, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Does anyone have any strong feelings about possibly incorporating > testng > > > > into some of the 4.1 unit tests? > > > > > > > > The good part about this is that testng can happily run any junit > test > > > > (as > > > > well as the eclipse plugin), along with a number of additional > useful > > > > features: > > > > > > IMHO, the Eclipse plug-in has some ways to go before it's really > useful, > > > unless you're willing to handcraft a TestNG XML file. I've filed some > > > bugs in their JIRA and Alexandru has even addressed some of the > issues, so > > > that's cool. Just something to be aware of. With that being said, > I'm > > > not a Tapestry dev, so it's ultimately up to you guys. > > > > > > -- > > > Kevin > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
