Ahehe. Thanks Alexendru :)
On 2/14/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Addressed the issue. Apologise Tapestry :-). > > ./alex > -- > .w( the_mindstorm )p. > > On 2/13/06, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:24:57 -0500, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Is it really breaking the java annotation spec if you do a search on > > > super > > > classes as well? > > > > > > Either way I understand the frustration but don't think I can help if > the > > > two core devs already voted -1 on this feature. Hmmm... > > > > Well, the issue I raised in this thread is actually a bit different from > > what you saw on the TestNG list. Since Alexandru responded separately > > here, I'll try to clarify the issue for him a bit more. Like I said, at > > least they're responsive :-) > > > > See http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/TESTNG-19 for more details. The > > initial report was based on my misunderstanding of how the annotations > > worked, but there still is a problem with using template methods. The > > example there is weak, so I'll provide a stronger one. > > > > -- > > Kevin > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
