-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'd like to speak for 4.X, but I've had issues with those tests that I'm attempting to lay on using the wrong code (trunk? branch?). I just verify that the only failures I see prior to a patch are the only ones I see after. [no, not the way it should be done, but at least I'm verifying that I'm not introducing any bugs] Hopefully I'll be able to get that sorted out sooner rather than later.
As for 3.X, yes - there's a problem with downloading junit now (sf download links aren't the greatest thing to rely on), but an "ant junit" says everything's working. Are you experiencing any issues? Andreas Andreou wrote: >> I'd really like to get existing patches for 4.X and 3.X committed and >> get fixes to those documentation issues (marked "no patches yet" below) >> in prior to a release vote. > > Agreed, i wouldn't mind waiting till then. > BTW, anyone running the tests for 3.X and 4.X lately? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEICeCaCoPKRow/gARAuoBAJwLnPXqYNOkWVR1jJZH5ks6ulYFBACgzu1S SUF8TvaWr+eNHtmneaLMWkg= =+Xn4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
