Brian K. Wallace wrote: > I'd like to speak for 4.X, but I've had issues with those tests that I'm > attempting to lay on using the wrong code (trunk? branch?). I just > verify that the only failures I see prior to a patch are the only ones I > see after. [no, not the way it should be done, but at least I'm > verifying that I'm not introducing any bugs] Hopefully I'll be able to > get that sorted out sooner rather than later. > > As for 3.X, yes - there's a problem with downloading junit now (sf > download links aren't the greatest thing to rely on), but an "ant junit" > says everything's working. > > Are you experiencing any issues?
No, i was just checking :) It's been a while since i've run them myself - too much work on Tacos for the moment... > > Andreas Andreou wrote: > > >>I'd really like to get existing patches for 4.X and 3.X committed and > >>get fixes to those documentation issues (marked "no patches yet" below) > >>in prior to a release vote. > > >Agreed, i wouldn't mind waiting till then. > >BTW, anyone running the tests for 3.X and 4.X lately? > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
