-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Agreed. If the component exists, docs should as well. Even if they're
deprecated in the next release and eventually removed.

*anxious for Andreas to get his commits ;-)*

Andreas Andreou wrote:
> Of course we do - it will enable my first commits :)
> 
> Seriously though, there are actual users that use these components, and
> since it's a 4.0.1 release, we shouldn't remove them.
> 
> Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> 
>> Do we even really want tree in there anymore?
>>
>> On 3/28/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> ok, i'll take Tree*, so that we can really close this before the vote
>>> ends.
>>>
>>> Brian K. Wallace wrote:
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>> Andreas Andreou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>> Brian K. Wallace wrote:
>>>>>        
>>>>>
>>>>>> There are a whole slew of documentation updates for the components
>>>>>> already (the single issue Howard raised that broke down into numerous
>>>>>> sub-tasks). Is there anything in the 4.0 branch that you know is still
>>>>>> missing?
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>
>>>>> In
>>>>>        
>>>>>
>>>> contrib/src/documentation/content/xdocs/tapestry-contrib/ComponentReference
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>> Table.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TableFormPages.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TableFormRows.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> Tree.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TreeDataView.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TreeNodeView.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TreeTable.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TreeTableDataView.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TreeTableNodeViewDelegator.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER
>>>>> CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>> TreeView.xml:<p> <strong>THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION</strong>
>>>>>        
>>>>>
>>>> My mistake in this one. I spot checked that issue (TAPESTRY-486) -
>>>> contents of some files and existence of all noted in the issue. Never in
>>>> my wildest imagination would I have thought the files would be there
>>>> with just "UNDER CONSTRUCTION" in it. :-/
>>>>
>>>> Issue should remain open and those docs done - and while I can work on
>>>> them, I wouldn't hold up the release waiting on it.
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>      
>>>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFEKW5baCoPKRow/gARArkJAJ95wYasoTx3qgTxhNDNKmXnvVpYbQCg90S4
s3X3YPwCnSyE1vUMB0kocl8=
=cabY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to