-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I know I'm sounding like a broken record, but here goes...
With what's going into 4.0.3 (and 3.0.5, but that doesn't appear to
affect anything if we bump to 3.1) as far as new features that are
backward compatible, wouldn't 4.0.3 be better suited as 4.1? This would
make the current 4.1 better as 4.2? Are all the changes in the current
4.1 backward compatible? Or would 4.1 be better as 5.0 - making the
current 5.0 better as 6.0?
Not trying to mess with anyone's ideas, just trying to stay coherent in
our releases and give users proper expectations of our releases.
[and believe it or not, I don't post unless I think it affects more than
just me]
Thoughts? [does anyone care? ('care' to be meant in the spirit of
"numbering's fine as is")]
Brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEVg+7aCoPKRow/gARAi+4AKCNeb0R0pzcoOT1MWd8so1dNaD9sgCg1AY1
oPRDTtTZ3xe9buu2u+2Qv4c=
=Ena2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
