> And everyone else ... Tapestry does need bigger > exposure, either through JBoss or Jakarta or both. Marc
Howard, Just forget about Jakarta, they won't let Tapestry in. Any web app framework is vetoed because they already have Struts/Cocoon/Turbine/Velocity, many ppl have tried that before, just search Jakarta-general archives. Imho Marc won't embrace Tapestry either, he have to stick to J2EE brand for various reasons imho. We all know that everyone's talking about complexity of EJB and EJB is what jboss is for really. Now let's say the community wakes up and abandons heavy use of EJB, the other big thingie in J2EE brand is JSP/JSF but we're asking Marc for abandoning it too in favor of Tapestry. I think it really doesn't fit in jboss's Weblogic-killer philosophy, they have to provide and emphasize jboss's full J2EE-ness. Btw I beleive Tapestry is really good for web *applications*, not read mostly sites, like jboss.org for example, but maybe for its forums software yes. Anyway, just my memory dump.... Ara. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
