On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 14:24 Europe/Zurich, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've seen some responses that say Tapestry simply isn't for the > masses, but I just don't buy it.� At the core, Tapestry is simpler > than other frameworks and more powerful, it should be much more widely > adopted.� I buy into the "shark" theory ... keep swimming or die, > Tapestry must extend its range or it will never escape niche status > and will eventually die off.�� Tapestry RAD could be the thing that > gets Tapestry in front of� a lot more eyeballs. Right. Swimming is good. But you seems to want to head for Orlando instead of focusing on building a truly enterprise class super-liner. This is your choice. PA. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
