Hi Richard, 

I am one of such WO developers. I know very little about Tapestry internals 
yet, since I just started its evaluation. But I trust the people who 
recommended it to me. 

 From the standpoint where I am right now (of total ignorance about Tapestry 
features/usability :-)), the most important is the "marketing" aspect of it. 
Basically a perception that this is something that is going to replace the 
void, now that WebObjects is not an option. 

For an opensource project, the only way this can be achieved is by working 
with WO community directly. Offering Tapestry as a solution on WO mailing 
list when people ask for it. This is the only way, short from running a 
multimillion dollar TV commercial :-). 

I wish I had some positive feedback about Tapestry back in July when I was 
starting on a new project. We selected Struts and it became the source of 
enormous pain. And this was all because no one ever posted a Tapestry 
success story on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (till recently I guess). 

After this "perception" barrier is broken, you can start talking about 
features, etc. I understand that Tapestry has a lot to offer to a WO 
developer as it is. 

And of course to switch from WO, Web presentation layer is not enough. You 
need an EOF substitute. Cayenne team is currently working on a 
Tapestry/Cayenne tutorial to demonstrate a "full" solution. 

Cheers 

Andrus
http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/ 

 

 


Richard Lewis-Shell writes:
> It seems to me that Tapestry is swimming quite well just now.  It's not just
> Marc's inflammatory remarks - this forum has had a noticeable increase in
> traffic recently.  Also seems to me that there has been something of a
> sudden uptake by WO developers.  If you want to get Tapestry out into a lot
> of places where the barrier to its 'complexity' is low, then targetting WO
> developers is likely going to be the biggest bang-for-buck option.  More
> developers -> more contributors -> faster swimming.  Any ideas from WO folk
> here as to how Tapestry uptake might be encouraged for WO developers (rather
> than JSP developers)?
 


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Tapestry-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer

Reply via email to