No wait I think I misspoke. I meant Commons Configuration. Stanczak Group wrote:
>Really what I'm wanting to do can probably be address by just using >something like Commons Digester. But maybe using a framework like >Hivemind I could better organize my logic. Again, as you can tell I'm >just not understanding all the pieces. > >Jamie Orchard-Hays wrote: > > > >>The questions are, "What problems are you trying to solve?" "Which >>frameworks help you solve them best: Spring, Hivemind, none?" In other >>words, you must have a need, a problem to solve that requires a >>framework like Hivemind. >> >>Tapestry Picasso uses Hivemind to give it greater flexibility, >>extensibility, configurability. You can pretty much ignore it for >>basic Tapestry tasks. >> >>There have been some threads over the past few days about using Spring >>for DB stuff, which (from what I read, not personal experience) >>integrates well with Tapestry and Hivemind. >> >>Jamie >> >>On May 11, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Stanczak Group wrote: >> >> >> >>>I've been looking at Hivemind, Spring, etc, trying to understand things. >>>So what I've came up with thus far is since I'm starting out fresh and >>>am already using Tapestry, I would probably be wise to use Hivemind. Is >>>this correct? Then I see Tapestry is being built on Hivemind, so that >>>makes me think it's a better choice. Now I'm trying to understand the >>>combo of Tapestry and Hivemind. I'm guessing you still use Hivemind >>>separate from Tapestry, and Tapestry is using Hivemind for it's own >>>uses. But my question is will the addition of Hivemind to Tapestry add >>>the features I'm looking for to Tapestry and I won't need Hivemind, or >>>would I still be smart to go ahead and use Hivemind to help me better >>>develop my software? Maybe I'm way off here. I think I understand the >>>use of Hivemind, but I'm looking into the future and wondering what >>>direction I should follow. If my questions don't make sense then I'm >>>probably not understanding the use of Hivemind. Can someone direct me? >>> >>>-- >>>Justin Stanczak >>>Stanczak Group >>>812-735-3600 >>> >>>"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do >>>nothing." >>>Edmund Burke >>> >>>..________...............__................. >>>./ _____/..____..._____/..|_..____...____.... >>>/...\..____/.__.\./....\...__\/.._.\./._..\.... >>>\....\_\..\..___/|...|..\..|.(..<_>.|.<_>..).... >>>.\______../\___.._\__|../__|..\____/.\____/...... >>>........\/.....\/.....\/.......................... >>> >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> > > > -- Justin Stanczak Stanczak Group 812-735-3600 "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke ..________...............__................. ./ _____/..____..._____/..|_..____...____.... /...\..____/.__.\./....\...__\/.._.\./._..\.... \....\_\..\..___/|...|..\..|.(..<_>.|.<_>..).... .\______../\___.._\__|../__|..\____/.\____/...... ........\/.....\/.....\/.......................... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
