I guess it falls on Howard to clarify his statements. I would have a crack but my knowledge of WO far outstrips my Tapestry knowledge, and right now I am failing to see many advantages to Tapestry over what WO gives me (other than the price).
Howard? On 05/07/05, Mind Bridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am not versed very much in WO either, and I would prefer to avoid the > comparison for the time being as a result. > > As Howard mentioned, the If, Else, and For components in 4.0 eliminate the > StaleLink exceptions in Tapestry applications. They automatically detect if > placed in a form and store their state as Hidden fields. As a result the > rewind is guaranteed to repeat the corresponding render. The server state > (the session) is not loaded either -- you get the best of both worlds... > > 3.0 already had FormConditional and ListEdit, but you had to make an > explicit choice whether to use them. This is now implicit as If is to > replace Conditional and For is to replace Foreach. You do not have to worry > about making the choice anymore. > > Best regards, > -mb > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
