HiveBoard looks very promising. Definately something to keep an eye on. Thanks for the info.
On 7/29/05, Vinicius Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is my personal believes, and I expressed it many times on our > local JUG meetings. > > Today I work in a rich client project. We're using javaweb start with > SWT client connecting on a JBOSS Server with our EJBs. > I believe that, Laszlo is somehow a step back on RIA. It may solve a > few issues but it adds many problems. > > 1st. It impose to you that your client must have a webbrowser (ok, > 99.99 has it) and it must have flash (I don't) > > 2nd. It's slow. I don't understand the architecture of flash > components but they lie inside a webbrowser which itself consumes > memory. > > 3rd. You can't do everything that a REAL Rich Interface Application could do. > > So, my guess is, if you need better user interaction, migrate to a > real RIA, not attempts to do something that looks like RIA. I really > recommend you take a look at HiveBoard :D > If you don't need that, your project could be a webcentric, with just > minor enhancements (aka DHTML, AJAX), you're already at the right > place, you are using Tapestry. > > I hope that monster (aka Laszlo) does not become a standard. > > Just my thoughts... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ~chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
