Hmm, I think your solution looks much nicer. Seems
more elegant. I may refactor my code.
--- Adam Czysciak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Nelson wrote:
>
> > Yup, that did the trick. I love it when a problem
> > takes 2 paragraphs to explain and 1 sentence to
> solve
> > :)
>
> I solved it other way. If myCursor is the 'value'
> binding of Foreach (with
> type cursorType), I made the submit listener with
> signature:
> public void mySubmit(cursorType currentCursor);
> and then in @Submit, I added "parameters=myCursor"
> binding, and it worked.
> Then, in listener code, I don't have to operate on a
> cursor property, I have
> it passed as a parameter.
>
> Which is better, Howard? In the sense of Tapestry
> overhead, maybe
> memory/speed overhead?
>
>
> --
> Greets,
> Adam Czysciak
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform,
> SE 5
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
