+1.
Now, we can perhaps head on to the other charter changes related to this re-inserted milestone. I suggest the following undo's => I mean going back from THIS VERSION to the PREVIOUS VERSION, which is the version that went to IETF review: THIS VERSION: 2) Note that not all capabilities of IETF Transport protocols need to be exposed as Transport Services. This document will recommend the minimal set of Transport Services for inclusion in the abstract API. The resulting document will also provide guidance on making a choice among available mechanisms and protocols to obtain a certain Transport Service. PREVIOUS VERSION: 2) Note that not all capabilities of IETF Transport protocols need to be exposed as Transport Services. This document will recommend the minimal set of Transport Services that support mechanisms must provide (such as those in work item 3). The resulting document will also provide guidance on making a choice among available mechanisms and protocols to obtain a certain Transport Service. a bit below, for item 3 (last sentence): THIS VERSION: The associated milestone will be scheduled and work on this document will begin when the TAPS Transport Services have been specified. PREVIOUS VERSION: Work on this document will begin when the TAPS Transport Services have been specified. Not relevant to this particular discussion, but a suggested minor change nevertheless, for the out-of-scope list: THIS VERSION: - Extension, modification, or creation of existing IETF transport protocols PREVIOUS VERSION: - Extension, modification, or creation of transport protocols The only problem I have here is that "the creation of existing.... protocols" does not sound very logical. I suggest to remove "existing". Cheers, Michael On 19. aug. 2014, at 17:32, Brian Trammell wrote: > hi Toby, > > On 19 Aug 2014, at 17:31, Toby Moncaster <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I’d be happier with rephrasing it slightly as: >> >> M18: Submit an Experimental document to the IESG specifying one or more >> methods to provide applications with the Transport Services identified by >> the WG. > > Works for me. > > Cheers, > > Brian > >> On 19 Aug 2014, at 16:27, Anna Brunstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 2014-08-19 14:01, Brian Trammell wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> M18: Submit to the IESG an Experimental document specifying methods for >>>> providing the Transport Services identified by the WG to applications. >>>> How's that? Cheers, Brian >>> >>> Sounds good to me as well. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Anna >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Taps mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
