hi Marie-Jose, The intention with this document is to include as much of the work in the IETF that provides services for transport (for some definition of "transport" and some definition of "service"; we're working now on a strawman terminology to shoot holes in in Honolulu), so the broad answer to every question below is "yes".
Cheers, Brian On 28 Oct 2014, at 19:18, Marie-Jose Montpetit <[email protected]> wrote: > This is interesting and I think a good start for overall framework. While I > have not tallied which one of those are in the IETF would we want to also > include some of the TCP accelerator work? And of course some the IRTF work on > network coding that exposes a reliable and error free service could > eventually be added when it makes it to IETF? > > /mjm > Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D. > [email protected] > @SocialTVMIT > >> On Oct 28, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Folks- >> >> Gorry & Brian have published an annotated framework for TAPS doc 1 on >> transport services here. We'll discuss whether to adopt it as a working >> group doc in Honolulu. I encourage you to send comments and offers to >> contribute text before then. >> >> --aaron >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
