I thin kwe are going to face a lot of "extensions". Maybe a secondary goal 
could be to define a standard way to access both IETF and "extension" 
transports?

/mjm
Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D.
[email protected]
@SocialTVMIT

> On Nov 3, 2014, at 9:10 AM, Brian Trammell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 03 Nov 2014, at 13:56, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for a good start.
>> 
>> I notice that MPTCP is quoted as a transport protocol but that CMT-SCTP 
>> isn’t. I assume that this 
>> is motivated by the fact that the taps work very clearly draws the line in 
>> between 
>> features that have made it through IETF standardisation (even as 
>> informational)  and features that have not and
>> only are specified in “seemingly dormant” individual drafts. Correct ?
> 
> This is the intention (in keeping with item 1 on the charter). However, 
> _this_ revision is very -00 and as such has only the most obvious things we 
> could think of just before the deadline. My personal opinion is that if we 
> can illustrate an interesting transport service using a proposed extension to 
> an IETF protocol, then by all means let’s do so. 
> 
>> In terms of SCTP and the transport service that it provides, then I wonder 
>> if the priority feature that it embeds is something
>> that afford special mentioning in this document. I.e., by usage of streams 
>> and priority settings on streams then it is possible
>> to enforce that messages written on particular stream is able to outrace 
>> messages written on other non-prioritized streams at least from a 
>> sender transmittal perspective.
>> The feature is actually started to be deployed for some applications in 
>> present signalling networks but it is only partially standardized in that the
>> tsvwg documents (ndata, secondary SCTP-pr) that specifies the feature are 
>> not finished yet. Still the features are described in standards track 
>> documents.
> 
> This definitely seems to be a transport service of interest. 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Brian
> 
>> From: Taps [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Falk
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:04 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: Gorry Fairhurst; Brian Trammell
>> Subject: [Taps] new draft available: draft-fairhurst-taps-transports-00
>> 
>> Hi Folks-
>> 
>> Gorry & Brian have published an annotated framework for TAPS doc 1 on 
>> transport services here.  We'll discuss whether to adopt it as a working 
>> group doc in Honolulu.  I encourage you to send comments and offers to 
>> contribute text before then.  
>> 
>> --aaron
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to