Hi,
> On 16 Mar 2015, at 23:54, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > HI, > > Please accept the following "minor" comments/questions to the TCP protocol > components: > > #1: > The list include both of the followings: > > *ordered delivery for each byte stream > * stream-oriented delivery in a single stream > > Wouldn't it be more fair to combine these two and say: > > *ordered delivery in a single stream > > "Each stream" seems a little too much for TCP, I think. > > #2: > Segmentation and bundling is listed as separate components, even if > bundling, for TCP, is part of the segmentation process. > I suppose that is as it should be, but when speaking "Bundling" then I > actually think that "Bundling delay" is a better term. Especially for TCP. > > To put in context: > For SCTP it is actually relevant to discuss bundling and bundling delay > separately as two different components. > Meaning that SCTP WILL bundle PDUs up to PMTU size (and I would call that > bundling), but it CAN (depending on no_delay setting) implement bundling > delay or not. So how does bundling without delaying work? Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
