> On 17 Mar 2015, at 12:26, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Welzl [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 11:09 AM
>> To: Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transports-03.txt
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>>> On 16 Mar 2015, at 23:54, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> HI,
>>> 
>>> Please accept the following "minor" comments/questions to the TCP
>>> protocol
>>> components:
>>> 
>>> #1:
>>> The list include both of the followings:
>>> 
>>> *ordered delivery for each byte stream
>>> * stream-oriented delivery in a single stream
>>> 
>>> Wouldn't it be more fair to combine these two and say:
>>> 
>>> *ordered delivery in a single stream
>>> 
>>> "Each stream" seems a little too much for TCP, I think.
>>> 
>>> #2:
>>> Segmentation and bundling is listed as separate components, even if
>>> bundling, for TCP, is part of the segmentation process.
>>> I suppose that is as it should be, but when speaking "Bundling" then I
>>> actually think that "Bundling delay" is a better term. Especially for
> TCP.
>>> 
>>> To put in context:
>>> For SCTP it is actually relevant to discuss bundling and bundling
>>> delay separately  as two different components.
>>> Meaning that SCTP WILL bundle PDUs up to PMTU size (and I would call
>>> that bundling), but it CAN (depending on no_delay setting) implement
>>> bundling delay or not.
>> 
>> So how does bundling without delaying work?
>> 
> [Karen ]
> If there are multiple messages available for transmittal in the SND
> buffer. E.g.,
> 2 messages of 600 bytes would be bundled into the same SCTP packet.
> This of course is only in situations where there has been congestion or
> receiver window blocking.
> 
> For TCP this "bundling" of data bytes is part of the basic segment
> partitioning of the data byte stream.

Ok, thanks...  yes this is indeed different from "Nagle'ing"...

Cheers,
Michael

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to