Hi, I'd also like to request to present draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-00 or maybe an -01 version if we manage to do one by the meeting (which I doubt). This will just be a quick update.
As for the UDP and UDP-Lite draft below, it does look to me like a very welcome addition to draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage indeed! Cheers, Michael > On 23 Feb 2016, at 14:05, Gorry Fairhurst <go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote: > > We have just posted a new ID: > > Features of the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and Lightweight UDP (UDP- Lite) > Transport Protocols > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fairhurst-taps-transports-usage-udp/ > > This document provides input on UDP and UDP-Lite usage for the TAPS WG. In > putting this together, we tried to stick with the rules of the WG usage > draft, although the documentation for UDP in RFC series was more than a > little erratic and scattered. I'd like to request time to present this at the > BA IETF meeting, and we intend there to propose this as a formal contribution > to develop the datagram part of draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage. > > We would very much appreciate it if people who understand UDP could read and > offer any comments. If there are some comments we would be happy to make > further updates before the next meeting. > > best wishes, > > Gorry & Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
