Couple of minor comments on the draft <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fairhurst-taps-transports-usage-udp-01>:
- No mention of ECN in phase 2. Am I missing something? - You had asked about what app-oriented IETF groups might be able to review the API. It's a good question for draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage as well. Wonder if the wg has any suggestions? Perhaps we should raise the question in APPSAWG although they don't seem to be meeting this IETF... --aaron
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
