On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, Aaron and Gorry, > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Couple of minor comments on the draft >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fairhurst-taps-transports-usage-udp-01> >> : >> >> - No mention of ECN in phase 2. Am I missing something? >> - You had asked about what app-oriented IETF groups might be able to >> review the API. It's a good question for draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage >> as well. Wonder if the wg has any suggestions? Perhaps we should raise >> the question in APPSAWG although they don't seem to be meeting this >> IETF... >> >> > If you can corner Mary Barnes, Cullen Jennings, or Murray Kucherawy at the > welcome reception, you might ask if Dispatch is the right place to ask > about these drafts - now that APP is part of ART, Dispatch has a broader > scope than just RAI, and they are meeting this time (on Monday morning, so > ask fast) ... > > Spencer > So, is DISPATCH the new APPSAWG? If so, we need to add it to our conflict avoid list (esp since we conflict with it this week). --aaron
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
