Hi, Gorry (et al.), On 10/10/2016 9:56 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> ... > OK, so in the context of TAPS, the WG called for a list of UDP services. > This is what is in the ID. ... > > This ID clearly isn't an API spec. > > ... > I don't personally know whether an API spec for UDP is useful or not, but > suspect the list of services needed by UDP Apps is the thing the WG is > presnetly looking for. I have to admit I have no idea what you mean by "the list of services needed by UDP Apps" if that doesn't basically start and end with the UDP API. Anything else needed by UDP apps isn't needed because they're UDP. And having that list (of "things besides the UDP API") without a proper UDP API wouldn't be very useful. Joe
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
