I believe the idea was actually to have the policy after the socket intents 
talk; maybe even after HE?

Mirja


> Am 06.07.2017 um 16:56 schrieb Aaron Falk <[email protected]>:
> 
> Updated. Still need a policy framing preso (#4) and timing.
> 
>       • Minimal Set of Transport Services for TAPS Systems, Naeem Khademi 
> (presenting for authors)
> 
>               • draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt
>               • What’s new: the abstract API
>       • Transport Security Protocol Survey, Tommy Pauly
> 
>               • At the meeting in Chicago, the question of how security 
> protocols should be handled was brought up, and we suggested writing a draft 
> to do a survey of Transport Security protocols, similar to the work done in 
> RFC 8095 and the transport usage drafts. This document goes over several 
> common transport security protocols and analyzes their features and 
> interfaces, particularly with regards to how they interact with their 
> associated transport protocols and applications. For consideration as a TAPS 
> working group doc.
>               • draft-pauly-taps-transport-security-00.txt: The common 
> features/interface presented by various security protocols
>               • draft-kuehlewind-taps-crypto-sep-00.txt: The ability to 
> separate security handshakes from data encryption
>       • Application- & System-Specified Policy & TAPS, [[XX someone needs to 
> frame this topic. who? Brian? Tommy? XX]]
> 
>       • Socket Intents, Concepts & Communication Granularity, Phillipp Tiesel
> 
>               • Socket Intents allow applications to share their knowledge 
> about upcoming communication and express their performance preferences in an 
> API independent way. Therefore, thy can be used by an OS/API to gain enough 
> knowledge to perform access as well as transport protocol selection and 
> tuning.
>               • draft-tiesel-taps-socketintents-00.txt: concepts
>               • draft-tiesel-taps-communitgrany-00.txt: endpoint and path 
> selection
>               • draft-tiesel-taps-socketintents-bsdsockets-00.txt: prototype
>       • Happy Eyeballs update, Anna Brunstrom
> 
>               • draft-grinnemo-taps-he-03.txt
>               • The interface between the HE algorithm and the policy 
> management
>               • What should be detailed in the specification of the HE 
> algorithm and what should be left open for implementation?
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to