Hi all,
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Tommy Pauly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> hi Aaron, >> >>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 17:36, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Updating. Our agenda time is much more productive if we can home in on >>> specific questions to discuss rather than just give document overviews. >>> Authors & other folk: what’s interesting, unclear, or controversial here? >> >> I think it's time to level up and have a discussion about "policy" and how >> it relates to TAPS. >> >> I'm going to leave the definition of "policy" here deliberately vague with >> the hope that we can start to build some terminology around it at the >> meeting. > > +1 to having a general discussion on the topic of policy (both > application-specified and system-specified), likely following onto the > presentation of intents. Getting a formal set of definitions would really > help moving forward in our discussions. +1 from me too. BTW, NEAT already has quite an elaborate policy system built in. Naeem gave a high-level look at it at the last meeting: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-taps-42-neat-naeem-khademi-00.pdf <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-taps-42-neat-naeem-khademi-00.pdf> (slides 6/7) More details are here: https://www.neat-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/commag16-accepted-version.pdf <https://www.neat-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/commag16-accepted-version.pdf> This says “until published”, but I think this has just happened: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7945852/ <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7945852/> Cheers, Michael
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
