Issues
------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+2/-7/💬11)
 2 issues created:
 - Should "send" return a MessageContex? (by philsbln)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/336 [API] [discuss] - Consider message send API that takes padding policy as input (by chris-wood) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/334
 8 issues received 11 new comments:
 - #334 Consider message send API that takes padding policy as input (3 by 
philsbln, gorryfair, chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/334 - #315 Default for Control checksum coverage (2 by britram, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/315 [API] [ready for text] - #257 Not all Events are shown in the diagram (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/257 [Architecture] - #266 Do we want to add Connection Pools to the Architecture / API (1 by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/266 [API] [Architecture] [discuss] - #331 9.1 defaults (1 by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/331 [API] - #304 Clarify mapping of Connection to multiple flows (1 by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/304 [Architecture] - #305 Protocol stacks that are not equivalent (1 by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/305 [Architecture] - #316 Section 4.2.1 - Transport Properties (1 by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/316 [API]
 7 issues closed:
- 9.1 defaults https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/331 [API] - Section 4.2.1 - Transport Properties https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/316 [API] - Default for Control checksum coverage https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/315 [API] [ready for text] - Default for Use 0-RTT session establishment https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/314 [API] [discuss] - msgref is never specified https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/310 [API] - Clarify mapping of Connection to multiple flows https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/304 [Architecture] - More editorial author comments on API https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/318 [API]


Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+1/-3/💬6)
 1 pull requests submitted:
 - Various minor issues - closes #314, #315 #316 and #331 (by mwelzl)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/335
 4 pull requests received 6 new comments:
 - #327 Adding a way of forcing the use of specific protocols (2 by philsbln, 
britram)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/327 [API] [discuss] - #321 Merge Message References and Message Contexts and enable their use for Requests/Response protocols (2 by mwelzl, tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/321 [API] - #323 Add details to the Framer Interface (1 by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/323 - #328 Add Transport Property Profiles (1 by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/328 [API] [discuss]
 3 pull requests merged:
 - Various minor issues - closes #314, #315 #316 and #331
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/335 - Merge Message References and Message Contexts and enable their use for Requests/Response protocols https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/321 [API] - Add details to the Framer Interface https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/323

Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to