Issues
------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+2/-5/💬6)
 2 issues created:
 - Default values (by mwelzl)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/357 [API] - Fix "Implementing maintenance" section (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/356
 6 issues received 6 new comments:
 - #257 Not all Events are shown in the diagram (1 by tfpauly)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/257 [Architecture] - #145 Draft should point at implementations somewhere (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/145 [Implementation] [ready for text] - #309 Clarification on queued receives (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/309 [API] - #343 Listeners should have backpressure (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/343 [API] [ready for text] - #282 Implementation should describe how to handle proxies/TOR (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/282 [Implementation] [discuss] [help wanted] - #255 Editorial: Move Message Object to basic objects section (1 by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/255 [Architecture] [discuss]
 5 issues closed:
- Update implementation mapping text for SCTP https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/337 [Implementation] [ready for text] - The recommended default and can we specify rather than recommend? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/317 [API] [ready for text] - Listeners should have backpressure https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/343 [API] [ready for text] - Not all Events are shown in the diagram https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/257 [Architecture] - Editorial: Move Message Object to basic objects section https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/255 [Architecture] [discuss]


Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+4/-4/💬2)
 4 pull requests submitted:
 - Architecture: Make overview section an actual overview (by tfpauly)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/355 - Cleanup diagram to remove message, and add rendezvous (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/354 - Rename "Basic Objects" to "Connection Objects" to reduce confusion (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/353 - Implementation: mapping back to RFC 8303 (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/352
 2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
 - #352 Implementation: mapping back to RFC 8303 (1 by mwelzl)
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/352 - #346 Fixes #313 per Gorry's comments (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/346
 4 pull requests merged:
 - Implementation: mapping back to RFC 8303
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/352 - Architecture: Make overview section an actual overview https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/355 - Cleanup diagram to remove message, and add rendezvous https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/354 - Rename "Basic Objects" to "Connection Objects" to reduce confusion https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/353

Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to